Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-G1.SNIPER B7-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte G1.SNIPER B7
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.SNIPER B7-CF  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 14:58
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 73.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 682
72% 578 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
EVGA(3842 1235) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 2.6
5% 5.27 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 2.9
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1422 1352 1258 1342 1310 1354 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,453
Write 1,327
Mixed 1,019
SusWrite 1,340
289% 1,285 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 68
244% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 935
DQ Mixed 272
355% 628 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 251%
Great: 295%
SanDisk Extreme Go USB 3.1 128GB-$36
113GB free, PID 558b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 19 0.2 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 178
Write 53.6
Mixed 110
SusWrite 13.5
100% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Mixed 2.5
131% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C4FE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 6.9
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 9.6
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.SNIPER B7-CF Builds (Compare 739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.SNIPER B7-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $196
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback