Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E6410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6410  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0667CC
Memory1.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110823
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 11:36
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Memory 44
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 55.5
29% 45.4 Pts
4-Core 44
8-Core 62.9
7% 53.5 Pts
64-Core 88.1
6% 88.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS500M60C-1 60GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0614D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 39 24 26 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 204
Write 54.7
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 32.6
20% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 14.2
47% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 55
DQ Write 54.8
DQ Mixed 52.2
40% 54 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 54%
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
63GB free
Firmware: HH100-15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 58 57 59 60 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 60.4
Write 36
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 57.2
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 80AD HMT125S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.7
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6410 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback