Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 15:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 80.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 215
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 636
68% 540 Pts
64-Core 872
54% 872 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 120
Parallax 122
109% 125 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.5
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 160 71 67 47 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 461
Write 180
Mixed 334
SusWrite 108
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 33.9
138% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 191
166% 243 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
66GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 85.4
Write 62.4
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 51.5
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C13D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 32.9
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 29.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback