Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire GX-785

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire GX-785  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire GX-785(KBL)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 09:15
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 199
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 380
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Sapphire(174B E354) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.9.1
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.8% Below average
Lighting 49
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 67
40% 57.9 fps
MRender 57.3
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 43.1
36% 45.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 67 102 88 97 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 75.7
Write 55.9
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 89
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire GX-785 Builds (Compare 647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Acer Aspire GX-785

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback