Today's hottest deals

MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150330
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 20:43
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3258-$28
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 187
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 180
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$155
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 27.9
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 32.6
23% 32.7 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 22.6
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500AVJS-63B6A0 250GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 63 64 64 63 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 77
Write 73.7
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 62.6
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 51%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
202GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 60 61 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 62
Write 58.5
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 60.6
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-P33 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 5,205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817) - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback