Today's hottest deals

Samsung 550XDA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 550XDA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XDA-KF2BR
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 00:21
Run Duration1508 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 66.2
1-Core 149
2-Core 283
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 644
69% 547 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Sanyo(144D C195) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 22.7
16% 22.2 fps
MRender 19.8
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 16.3
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-8D256 256GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT22005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 230 163 219 116 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,656
Write 921
Mixed 125
SusWrite 207
158% 727 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 15.3
129% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 491
DQ Write 478
DQ Mixed 173
216% 381 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 137%
Great: 161%
Seagate ST320LT009-9WC142 320GB
252GB free
Firmware: 1002DEMA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 109 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 108
Write 24.7
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 110
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 62%
SKYMEDI USB Drive 4GB
3GB free, PID 8628
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.8 7.7 8.1 7.8 8.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 7.9
11% 9.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.4% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 17
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550XDA Builds (Compare 1,510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550XDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $143
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback