Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81Q6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81Q6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190505
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 00:04
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 159
57% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 540
53% 433 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FFC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.49
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37% Below average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 51
Parallax 38.4
45% 48.3 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 57.5
21% 20.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 37%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDHTNG-8310A 512GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80060C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 100 98 100 75 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 380
Write 113
Mixed 195
SusWrite 101
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 30.4
126% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 500
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 303
252% 369 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 159%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
444GB free
Firmware: LXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 142 142 142 142 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 101
Write 157
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 141
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 22.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81Q6 Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 81Q6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback