Today's hottest deals

Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime113.7 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 19:56
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 506
51% 415 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 78.1
49% 68.4 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 54.3
Splatting 41.1
41% 51.2 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 121 122 121 122 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 395
Write 137
Mixed 194
SusWrite 119
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 26.8
117% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 153
118% 161 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 82%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
341GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 15 0.6 28 3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 223
Write 120
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 8
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.3
176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$84
341GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 13 1.9 16 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3.2
Write 0.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 8
2% 3.35 MB/s
4K Write 0.9
50% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 32TB
29.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 22.1
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 24
18% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.4
444% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $737
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback