Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 18:37
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 179
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 335
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 332
21% 332 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.2% Very good
Lighting 97.2
Reflection 107
Parallax 99.1
79% 101 fps
MRender 92.1
Gravity 101
Splatting 97
79% 96.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN8480PCSE 480GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8EET6101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 291 268 272 272 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 266
Write 328
Mixed 296
SusWrite 265
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 30.7
102% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.9
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 43.3
40% 58.8 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 111%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
106GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 124
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68AP-D3 Builds (Compare 1,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback