PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 18E7 |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190417 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 28 '21 at 12:46 |
Run Duration | 223 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 59% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
68.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZ7WD480HAGM-000D3 480GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM89D3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 153 150 135 139 125 MB/s
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
297GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 351 389 407 396 381 MB/s
|
89.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Asmt ASM1156-PM 240GB
42GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
797GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
JOY000000008004857 JOY000000008004860 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
54%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $65Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 1,059x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 899x |
Core i7-4790Intel $115Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 322x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 1,016x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 346x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $150Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 233x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $105 |