Today's hottest deals

Biostar J1900NH2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar J1900NH2  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 11:22
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 47.2
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 43.2
26% 37.3 Pts
4-Core 84.7
8-Core 85.6
11% 85.1 Pts
64-Core 85
5% 85 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Biostar(1565 1111) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.5 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OSC 128GB 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 105 121 120 123 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 336
Write 127
Mixed 142
SusWrite 120
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 8.3
48% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 48.5
56% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
170GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 112 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 112
Write 114
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J1900NH2 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar J1900NH2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback