Today's hottest deals

Axis S2016

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAxis S2016  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL SHARKBAY
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160607
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 07:55
Run Duration1309 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 361
48% 363 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500MS480G 480GB
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 216 183 91 186 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 409
Mixed 358
SusWrite 205
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 44.6
156% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 182
162% 245 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MD04ABA400V 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: FP1T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 154 158 156 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 152
Mixed 59
SusWrite 154
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MD04ABA400V 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: FP1T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 150 153 152 150 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 150
Write 156
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 153
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 13.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback