Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2V  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 06:16
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 164
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 276
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 4.5
2% 3.27 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 165 81 78 78 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 432
Write 324
Mixed 318
SusWrite 134
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 30.8
140% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 187
165% 245 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
21GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 50 37 44 46 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 83.5
Write 15.7
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 37.5
59% 49 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
58% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2V Builds (Compare 511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback