Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A7 V13.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V13.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V13.1
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210916
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 20 '21 at 15:31
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 70.4
1-Core 161
2-Core 321
96% 184 Pts
4-Core 615
8-Core 921
96% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,122
70% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 5015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 77.7
Parallax 6.1
4% 29.7 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$85
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 951 1009 1043 1046 1045 1048 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,068
Write 1042
Mixed 973
SusWrite 1,024
232% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 245
4K Mixed 82.4
322% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 994
DQ Mixed 511
441% 630 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 234%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 14.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V13.1 Builds (Compare 325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V13.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback