Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive554% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '21 at 19:33
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 85.2
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,021
98% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,497
93% 1,497 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 197
Parallax 191
150% 190 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 189
Splatting 130
124% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 1TB
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.P7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3591 4595 4738 4834 4846 3915 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
554% Outstanding
Read 2,718
Write 4,863
Mixed 2,875
SusWrite 4,420
846% 3,719 MB/s
4K Read 84.4
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 117
390% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,464
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 1,374
982% 1,268 MB/s
Poor: 198%
This bench: 554%
Great: 563%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
654GB free
Firmware: S0530B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 427 316 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 506
Write 417
Mixed 373
SusWrite 201
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 18.6
83% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 82.9
DQ Write 25.2
DQ Mixed 23.1
25% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB-$89
592GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 314 314 314 313 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 416
Write 311
Mixed 276
SusWrite 311
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 21.4
93% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 64.6
DQ Mixed 74.5
64% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 121%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 2GB
2GB free, PID 0048, PNY USB
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Read 19.6
Write 5.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5.2
8% 8.12 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$90
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 39.8
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 40.3
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $963
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback