Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A785T-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M4A785T-M  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110228
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 18:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 82.9
46% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 165
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 32.8
19% 27.8 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 30
Splatting 25.8
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/128G 128GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R083
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 55 47 59 59 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 336
Write 272
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 67.3
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 63.7
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 2
40% 91 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$53
0GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 54 54 53 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 69.3
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 52.7
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A785T-M Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785T-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback