PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 7910 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 7910 (all builds) |
Memory | 123.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170228 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 06 '21 at 19:44 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
66.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 368 358 359 357 331 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-UH 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
54.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 64x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 59x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 49x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 103x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 71x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 70x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |