Today's hottest deals

Asus X550JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus X550JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JK
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141008
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 19:32
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 49.2
2-Core 68.3
43% 63.3 Pts
4-Core 89.2
8-Core 86
12% 87.6 Pts
64-Core 91.6
6% 91.6 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Asus(1043 178D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 6.9
6% 7.83 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 5.8
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 12 69 16 2.4 2.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 441
Write 364
Mixed 329
SusWrite 46.1
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 17.6
73% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 43.7
49% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550JK Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback