Today's hottest deals

Punch 75-324-44

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPunch 75-324-44  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 12:49
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$325
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 68.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 250
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 961
87% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,730
107% 1,730 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid ADATA SX8200NP 480GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 476 512 482 493 478 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 900
Write 512
Mixed 531
SusWrite 486
135% 608 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 22.3
85% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 236
152% 176 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 243%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$265
606GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1980 2000 1990 1995 1987 1979 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,203
Write 1,971
Mixed 1,399
SusWrite 1,989
425% 1,890 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 65.9
234% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 603
DQ Mixed 686
517% 695 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 313%
Great: 425%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 156 154 155 151 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 100
Write 133
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 156
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
211% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 90%
WD My Passport 0810 1TB
399GB free, PID 0810
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 82
Write 83
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 88.2
104% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 32.7
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 9.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 75-324-44 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

System: Punch 75-324-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $827
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback