Today's hottest deals

Asus GL502VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus GL502VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VM
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '21 at 07:28
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 526
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 29
24% 29.7 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 51.8
33% 38.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 372 292 154 144 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 407
Write 372
Mixed 343
SusWrite 249
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 38.1
143% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 300
217% 278 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
931GB free
Firmware: AX0R5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 107
Write 99.8
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 107
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.3
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL502VM Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Asus GL502VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback