Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 03:26
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 143
55% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 303
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 201 61 60 51 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 434
Write 324
Mixed 301
SusWrite 127
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 25
88% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 185
165% 248 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST31000340NS 1TB-$95
931GB free
Firmware: XR1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 101 57 51 39 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 104
Write 69.9
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 64.5
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 60%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
29GB free, PID 00ee
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 4.4 4.6 2.7 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 20.1
Write 1.2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 3.5
9% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.3% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 27.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 13.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback