Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15s-eq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15s-eq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8706
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '21 at 10:03
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 198
60% 114 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 152
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8706) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.50.02.01
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 5.2
3% 5.37 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 9.3
5% 6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CVB-8D128-HP 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 150 152 154 155 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 487
Write 384
Mixed 393
SusWrite 164
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 42.2
135% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 138
126% 195 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 91%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 11 12 11 12 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 6.3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 11.5
13% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-eq1xxx Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15s-eq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback