Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 02:32
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 153
2-Core 304
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1096
99% 834 Pts
64-Core 2,127
132% 2,127 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$751
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 119
Parallax 119
96% 119 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 118
Splatting 119
97% 118 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 479GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 262 138 330 228 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 866
Write 595
SusWrite 212
122% 558 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 22
93% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 5.4
DQ Mixed 194
116% 128 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 221%
Amd-raid ST3000DM001-1CH1 3TB
621GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 78 91 106 116 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
66% Good
Read 141
Write 104
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 89.5
69% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66%
Great: 108%
Amd-raid ST2000DM008-2FR1 2TB
72GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 98 116 119 210 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 53.7
Write 161
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 124
65% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.1
77% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.9% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 26.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 27.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570M Pro4 Builds (Compare 922 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback