Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardWistron 303C
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 12:10
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron SI-42
Socket A, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 43.4
1-Core 30.2
2-Core 29.1
25% 34.2 Pts
4-Core 28.6
8-Core 29.4
4% 29 Pts
64-Core 29.7
2% 29.7 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8200M G
HP(103C 360A) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8T32c18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 21 54 68 64 15 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.6% Poor
Read 108
Write 119
Mixed 98.9
SusWrite 45.9
21% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 11.4
39% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 42.4
DQ Mixed 24.1
20% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.1
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $143
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback