Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '21 at 00:35
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 235
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 819
73% 619 Pts
64-Core 1,123
70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 145
Parallax 240
108% 172 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 134
Splatting 97.1
94% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 181 68 54 94 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 482
Write 211
Mixed 334
SusWrite 105
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 30.4
124% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 171
154% 229 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
921GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 172 172 172 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 172
Mixed 111
SusWrite 171
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series CL16-18-18 D4-3000 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.2% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback