Today's hottest deals

Panasonic CF-C1BT02EGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.01GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemPanasonic CF-C1BT02EGE  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFC1-2
Memory1.4 GB free of 4.00781 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120529
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 14:46
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 82.2
48% 70.9 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 128
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 24 34 17 8.6 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Below average
Read 208
Write 177
Mixed 192
SusWrite 22.5
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 20.8
71% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 153
123% 174 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40%
Great: 100%
CF CARD 1GB
1GB free
Firmware: 20070709
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.37% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.6
0% 0.58 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.37%
Great: 0%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 44GB
1333, 0 MHz
4096, 40960 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-C1BT02EGE Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-C1BT02EGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback