Today's hottest deals

Dell DSS7500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell DSS7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X89R8
Memory110.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160526
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 18 '21 at 11:19
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 92.2
46% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 326
31% 256 Pts
64-Core 2,220
137% 2,220 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 33 53 51 23 6.7 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43% Average
Read 284
Write 103
Mixed 156
SusWrite 37.2
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 15.6
67% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 126
119% 181 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43%
Great: 85%
Micron_9300_MTFDHAL7T6TDP 7.5TB
7TB free
Firmware: 11300DR0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1748 1856 1768 1639 1628 1578 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 912
Write 1,466
Mixed 822
SusWrite 1,703
279% 1,226 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 23.4
85% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 540
387% 492 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 187%
Great: 348%
WDC WUH721818AL5204 18TB
86.5TB free
Firmware: C240
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 295 310 457 439 314 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.9% Average
Read 415
Write 358
Mixed 189
SusWrite 381
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 1
15% 5.43 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 22.7
16% 21.4 MB/s
WDC WUH721818AL5204 18TB
411.5TB free
Firmware: C240
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 231 227 233 236 229 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.8% Below average
Read 235
Write 234
Mixed 173
SusWrite 231
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 1.4
26% 7.8 MB/s
DQ Read 3.3
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36ASF4G72LZ-2G3A1 4x31.8GB
4 of 12 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.4% Good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 21.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback