Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba Satellite S855

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba Satellite S855 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130114
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '17 at 03:04
Run Duration	92 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 79.5 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 143 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 182 26% 188 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670M 910 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB22) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.932.5.3000 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.26% Terrible	Lighting 6.63 Reflection 6.58 Parallax 5.34 5% 6.18 fps	MRender 6.24 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 6.83 5% 5.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.26% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$59 9,402 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2048 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 817 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 1732 (0A) Spinup retry count 116 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 780 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 35 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 205 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 17436 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044249631 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8219 (DE) Loaded hours 97 97 1320 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 265 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	37.5% Below average	Read 57 Write 73.6 Mixed 71 51% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.13 58% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273BH1-CH9 2x4GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.8 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 16 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite S855 Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite S855

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	62x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	25x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	7x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	81x
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	13x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	2x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $53Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	20x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,461 samples	8x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 5,165 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $455

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350