Today's hottest deals

PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPSSC Z9PR-D12 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PR-D12 Series
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '21 at 03:16
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 187
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 700
62% 528 Pts
64-Core 1,745
108% 1,745 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 59.3
45% 61.1 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 53.5
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU655 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 181 67 38 31 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 234
Write 214
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 88.8
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 18.4
62% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 5.5
DQ Mixed 39.3
43% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH 8x4GB
8 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 31.2
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PR-D12 Series Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback