PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK Z9PR-D12 Series |
Memory | 25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180418 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 18 '21 at 03:16 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
73.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata SU655 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 181 67 38 31 47 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH 8x4GB
8 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
86.3%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 6x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v21stBench 55%, 214 samples | 3x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050Nvidia $91Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 5x |
GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples | 3x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $171 |