Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 01:55
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 140
58% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 291
34% 262 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 202 181 138 211 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 327
Write 217
Mixed 215
SusWrite 192
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 25.9
85% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.6
DQ Write 86.4
DQ Mixed 36.4
33% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 87%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 86 80 67 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 119
Write 92.1
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 83.7
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
168% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 76%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
799GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 193 175 149 195 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 233
Write 200
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 185
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.4
265% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 120%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 14.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback