Today's hottest deals

HP 500-054

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-054  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 07:55
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 50.6
18% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 56.6
8-Core 41.9
7% 49.2 Pts
64-Core 50.1
3% 50.1 Pts
Poor: 37% Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
XFX(1682 3121) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 20.9
15% 21.4 fps
MRender 22.4
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 15.3
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
667GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 43 42 55 51 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 99.3
Write 81.8
Mixed 46
SusWrite 54.8
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 103%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 106 109 106 106 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 93.4
Write 85.8
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 108
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 58%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5040ED58E9W1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
MC Read 1.1
MC Write 0.5
MC Mixed 2.3
4% 1.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 4.2
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 1,162
3% 1,162 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-054 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-054

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback