Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DP55WG
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110223
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 21:21
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$90
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 161
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 274
33% 253 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.47 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4
Splatting 3
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 180 199 194 194 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.6% Average
Read 156
Write 35.3
Mixed 178
SusWrite 184
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 24.9
91% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 64.4
DQ Mixed 42.2
34% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54333235553642465238432D48392020 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback