Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210520
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$67
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 178
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 521
50% 413 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.6% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 47.9
Parallax 33.2
28% 38.3 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 28.1
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$110
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,913
Write 1,987
Mixed 1679
416% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 54.8
179% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 709
DQ Write 417
DQ Mixed 576
425% 567 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
363GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2088 2088 2092 2075 2050 2040 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,246
Write 2,226
Mixed 2,173
SusWrite 2,072
492% 2,179 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 71.6
231% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 756
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 622
461% 615 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 316%
Great: 477%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
719GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 161 163 164 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 174
Mixed 116
SusWrite 160
118% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 141 141 143 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 123
Write 106
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 140
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 100%
WD Se 4TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 172 178 180 179 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 166
Mixed 111
SusWrite 176
115% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
224% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX F4-2400C15-4GRR F4-2400C15-4GRR 39GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
32767, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 12.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 4R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 31% 35 206 141 60 27" 2560 1440 MSI3FA7 MSI MAG271CQR
History: Score 30: 4R 3G 1B | Score 35: 4R 4G 3B
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $953
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback