Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B450M GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200729
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 12:35
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 73.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 734
80% 633 Pts
64-Core 782
48% 782 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.2% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 35.6
28% 36.1 fps
MRender 34.6
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 26.1
26% 32.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C710 M.2 NVMe SSD 256GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 146 281 98 108 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 1,386
Write 952
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 168
141% 646 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 0.5
54% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 37.6
DQ Mixed 505
339% 429 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 231%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
325GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 142 145 142 78 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 182
Write 161
Mixed 81
SusWrite 124
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU880-36A180B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 27.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 24.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 3R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 32% 25 72 7 144 23.8" 1920 1080 MSI3BA4 MSI G241
History: Score 31: 5R 0G 6B | Score 26: 3R 3G 2B
Typical GA-B450M GAMING Builds (Compare 1,968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback