Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-E/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-E/M.2  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 15:19
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$35
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 225
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 342
45% 340 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 7.1
5% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 60GB 60GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0805A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 109 100 99 94 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 440
Write 229
Mixed 281
SusWrite 118
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 27.5
134% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 91.9
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 48.1
68% 122 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72%
Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
170GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 132 131 132 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 118
Write 114
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 131
70% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 103%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
0GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 1.9 4.5 3.6 3.3 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 19.1
Write 5.3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 3.7
9% 8.35 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 40" 1280 720 XXX0180 HDTV
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback