| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Biostar H61MLV3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130725 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 27 '21 at 05:06 |
| Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
| Run User | IND-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
28.7%
Poor
|
33% 55 Pts
|
10% 73.2 Pts
|
6% 101 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Biostar(1565 110F) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.64%
Terrible
|
0% 0.73 fps
|
1% 1.27 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$52
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 117 109 93 99 91 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
36% 159 MB/s
|
43% 13 MB/s
|
12% 16.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
18% 6.17 GB/s
|
12% 4.2 GB/s
|
22% 184 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 5 | 2 | 60 | 19.4" | 1280 720 | DELF06E DELL E2016HV |
Typical H61MLV3 Builds (Compare 266 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H61MLV3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium G2030Intel $24Bench 49%, 18,277 samples | 33x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 31x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 27x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 62x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 21x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $47 |