Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412DA
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 07:45
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 37
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 123
39% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 331
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1831) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.20.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.6
2% 3 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 422 401 398 374 403 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 510
Write 479
Mixed 403
SusWrite 410
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 29.4
87% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 213
161% 219 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH CT8G4SFRA266.M8FRS 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 14.2
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 5
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 6R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 43% 21 111 73 60 14" 1536 864 BOE07F6
History: Score 24: 4R 1G 1B | Score 33: 6R 0G 3B
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback