Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 05:55
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 835
85% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,366
84% 1,366 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Asus(1043 870B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 112
Parallax 135
99% 123 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 111
Splatting 106
104% 131 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1299 833 795 770 757 738 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,512
Write 2,256
Mixed 1,657
SusWrite 865
407% 1,822 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 84.5
283% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 1,062
806% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 290%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
670GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 217 207 208 216 216 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 139
Write 104
Mixed 76
SusWrite 210
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB
39GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 84 83 75 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 88.6
Write 64.9
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 81
98% 74 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 4.4
287% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$92
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 35
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 33.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 3R 5G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 51% 35 320 253 165 27" 2560 1440 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
History: Score 41: 3R 5G 11B | Score 40: 3R 5G 10B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $954
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback