PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200528 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '21 at 08:07 |
Run Duration | 373 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 293 296 296 295 296 MB/s
|
99.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Se 3TB (2013)-$145
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 168 169 170 169 MB/s
|
99%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$10
4GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 43 46 44 42 MB/s
|
27%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 5 | 3 | 60 | 23.4" | 1280 720 | VSC3822 VX2433wm |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $112Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 2,707x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $122Bench 98%, 65,928 samples | 1,264x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $88Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 885x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $450Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 854x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $280Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 722x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $291Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 646x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $677 |