Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 13:09
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 175
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 345
46% 343 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$146
Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 16
22% 21.5 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 17.1
13% 16 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
850GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 323 386 38 27 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 481
Write 389
Mixed 383
SusWrite 200
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 20.8
92% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 38
89% 180 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 1,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback