Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 01:16
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 320GE Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 170
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 232
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 7.7
4% 6.67 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.9
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 2280 SATA SSD 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PAFEC2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 84 84 89 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 333
Write 97.4
Mixed 139
SusWrite 85.1
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 4.1
59% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 61.6
64% 104 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4041BBA1D0MA1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 54.6" 1280 701 XXX2851 Beyond TV
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback