Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime19.5 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 02:49
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 70.9
1-Core 169
2-Core 319
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 753
77% 623 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 117
Parallax 32.6
24% 59.6 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 21.3
22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1028 1105 250 258 202 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,305
Write 1,200
Mixed 1,163
SusWrite 497
233% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 62.6
212% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,108
DQ Write 409
DQ Mixed 885
621% 800 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 182%
Great: 253%
SanDisk 8GB
6GB free, PID 5574,
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 1 2 1.6 2.7 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Read 19
Write 11.9
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 2.3
14% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
45% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 21.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 19
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback