Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412UA
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190830
Uptime11 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 17:48
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 104
48% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 183
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1721) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.3
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 113 110 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 310
Write 168
Mixed 242
SusWrite 111
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 12.8
51% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 214
168% 235 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412UA Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $233Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback