Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 17:34
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 174
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 627
59% 488 Pts
64-Core 847
52% 847 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Asus(1043 8675) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 217
Reflection 206
Parallax 237
177% 220 fps
MRender 273
Gravity 217
Splatting 159
171% 216 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 160%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata DM900 256GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5AD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 387 397 389 383 383 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.1% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 414
Mixed 398
SusWrite 386
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 38.9
136% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 246
197% 273 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 96%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 91 91 91 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 216
Write 160
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 89.2
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 108%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 90 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
115% Outstanding
Read 308
Write 319
Mixed 74
SusWrite 91.7
144% 198 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1
240% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-UH 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 35.5
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 20.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0F13 SAMSUNG
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback