Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 3484FMG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 3484FMG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120726
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 10:32
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G640-$30
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 146
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 147
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 8094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.37 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 68 78 63 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 114
Write 105
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 65.9
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 70%
General UDisk 8GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 6 6.7 5.5 6.7 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Read 3.8
Write 0.8
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 6.2
4% 2.75 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 10%
General UDisk 8GB
5GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.6 6.5 7.7 6.8 7.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 4.8
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 7.1
9% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 6.1
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 17" 1280 720 ACA5773 IIEP577
Typical 3484FMG Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3484FMG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback