Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookAir6,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookAir6,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7DF21CB3ED6977E5
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime22 Days
Run DateSep 09 '21 at 10:52
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4650U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 160
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 201
29% 213 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Apple(106B 011B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 8
4% 5.4 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SD0256F 251GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A222821
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 525
Write 432
Mixed 270
90% 409 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 19.3
76% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 420
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 132
154% 270 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B3445364533303445452D45474345 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 7.1" 1440 900 APP9CF0 Color LCD
Typical MacBookAir6,2 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir6,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback