Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 09 '21 at 10:23
Run Duration2838 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 182
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 518
51% 417 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 3397) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BTO-128GB 128GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 53 58 49 52 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 474
Write 383
Mixed 373
SusWrite 57.3
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 20
88% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 75.5
DQ Mixed 1
14% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 77%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
911GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 149 154 154 155 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 154
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 153
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 7.4 4.8 0.9 1.2 0.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 128
Write 137
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 2.8
104% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 60%
H/W DISK 2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 83 83 83 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.4% Average
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 81.8
128% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
140% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA MG03ACA100 1TB
598GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 145 149 151 148 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.1% Good
Read 135
Write 132
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 149
161% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.1
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 151 151 149 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 150
168% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 59%
H/W DISK 1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 3.7 0.9 0.4 0.6 1.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
Read 101
Write 98
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 1.2
85% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
82% 1.1 MB/s
ST3000DM 003-1F216N 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 5.7 1.1 0.4 0.6 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 155
Write 120
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 5.6
110% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 53%
H/W DISK 3 2TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 1.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.4% Poor
Read 98.1
Write 93.3
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 2.6
78% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.2 MB/s
H/W DISK 4 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 83 82 83 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
Read 107
Write 96.8
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 81.3
120% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.37 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston K1N7HK-ELC K1N7HK-HYC K1N7HK-ELC K1N7HK-HYC 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 13.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 10.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 HWP3326 HP 27es
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback