Today's hottest deals

MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 14:11
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 75.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 251
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 992
88% 746 Pts
64-Core 2,011
124% 2,011 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3942 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 115
Parallax 128
103% 123 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 123
Splatting 105
108% 137 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,442
Write 855
Mixed 1268
333% 1,522 MB/s
4K Read 57.3
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 72.3
248% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 910
661% 864 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SHFS37A 240GB
170GB free
Firmware: 605A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 167 157 160 145 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 358
Write 254
Mixed 266
SusWrite 158
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 10.5
35% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 65
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 63.5
75% 125 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 61%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
508GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 232 227 228 239 233 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.8% Poor
Read 64.1
Write 163
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 232
32% 137 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 4.1
15% 5.73 MB/s
DQ Read 12.2
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 12.5
9% 11.7 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 448%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$192
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
200% Outstanding
MC Read 81
MC Write 82.9
MC Mixed 78.4
231% 80.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 30.3
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 200%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 110 6 165 27" 2560 1440 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $655
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback