Today's hottest deals

Asrock A68M-ITX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A68M-ITX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '21 at 00:28
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 75.2
46% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 33.7
8-Core 70
6% 51.8 Pts
64-Core 80.2
5% 80.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
ASRock(1849 9991) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.4
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3
Splatting 3.4
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 500GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 234 302 378 255 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 331
Write 232
Mixed 131
SusWrite 259
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 13.1
67% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 78.7
74% 115 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 4.8
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 22%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 29 38 29 60 0.7" 1360 768 PHL0000 PHILIPS
Typical A68M-ITX R2.0 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A68M-ITX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback