Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory41.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 18:45
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 140
2-Core 266
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 780
79% 638 Pts
64-Core 777
48% 777 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 152
Parallax 141
123% 148 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 151
Splatting 127
110% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 115%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 914 507 507 507 508 507 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 8,834
Write 5,701
Mixed 6,702
SusWrite 575
1,210% 5,453 MB/s
4K Read 661
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 343
1,575% 419 MB/s
DQ Read 1,608
DQ Write 879
DQ Mixed 1,004
810% 1,164 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 137%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
291GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 456 460 458 458 458 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 436
Mixed 374
SusWrite 458
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 63
211% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
597GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 456 460 458 458 458 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 447
Mixed 390
SusWrite 458
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 63.8
212% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%
WD WD2003FZEX-00SRLA0 500GB
142GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 456 460 458 458 458 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 491
Write 418
Mixed 371
SusWrite 458
322% 435 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 62.4
10,965% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
3,316% 362 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 66%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
1TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 135 141 142 136 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 143
Write 150
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 138
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.9
214% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMD16GX4M2B3000C15 CMD32GX4M2B3000C15 CMD16GX4M2B3000C15 CMD32GX4M2B3000C15 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 24.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D22 S27F350
Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,003
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback